Steve Stoyko-Michael Goeller
Barry Attack [D00]
Round 11 - March 31, 2005
Chess Club Championship Kenilworth, NJ USA
Annotated by Michael Goeller, based on conversations
with Steve Stoyko after the game.
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Bf4 c6
I wish I had chosen instead the line 4...Bg7 5.e3 Bg4!
6.Be2 Bxf3! 7.Bxf3 c6 8.Qd2 0–0 9.0–0–0
Nbd7 10.g4 Nb6 11.h4 Nc4 12.Qd3 e5! 13.Bxe5 Nxe5
14.dxe5 Nd7 15.Be2 Nxe5 16.Qd2 b5 17.f4 Nd7= as in
Blatny-Ragozin, Vienna 1991
5.e3 Bg7 6.Be2
The standard position of the Barry Attack. For an
interesting article on this system, see Andrew Martin's
Games with Dodgy Names." White's control of e5
needs to be challenged.
Position after 7.Ne5 - the Barry Attack.
8...Nxe5 9.dxe5!? is worth investigating.
9.Nxd7 Nxd7 10.h5 e5 11.Bg3 Qb6 12.hxg6 hxg6 13.dxe5!?
In a game at the US Amateur Teams, where I played fourth
board to Steve's first board, he contested a game
that continued instead 13.Na4 Qa5+ 14.c3 b5 15.Nc5
+=. Unfortunately, distracted by my own game and three boards away,
I did not see it and missed out on some useful knowledge
going into the game. Steve assumed I had, and so
he was looking to vary at some point -- which is
probably what inspired the brilliant sac he came
Position after 13.dxe5!? Should Black play
I knew that I probably had to take the b-pawn. After
all, having said "A," Black must say"B." But I thought
the Knight sac with Nxd5! was scary. After the game,
Steve could not demonstrate a win for White to either
of our satisfaction, and Fritz seems to only come
up with a draw as well. But a little looking through
the following variations suggests that it isn't something
I'd want to venture into over the board, so maybe
I made the right practical decision. Here are some lines:
(Black cannot so easily decline the
sacrifice, or White gets a killer attack on the opened
a2-g8 diagonal practically for free, e.g.: 14...Nxe5?
15.Nc7! Qb4+ (15...Qc3+ 16.Kf1 Rb8 17.Qd4!!)
16.c3! Qxc3+ 17.Kf1 Rb8 18.Rc1 Qa5 19.Bxe5 Qxe5 20.Bc4+
Rf7 21.Qd8+ Bf8 22.Bxf7+ Kxf7 23.Rh7+ Kg8 24.Rh8+!
Kxh8 25.Qxf8+ Kh7 26.Ne8+-)
15.Qxd5+ Rf7 16.Bc4!
(Not 16.e6? Qxa1+ (or 16...Qc3+ 17.Kf1 Qxa1+ 18.Bd1
Ne5 19.exf7+ Nxf7–+) 17.Kd2 Qxh1 18.e7 Nf8
16...Qxa1+ 17.Kd2 Qxh1 18.Qxf7+
Hypothetical position after 18.Qxf7+ Kh7.
scary, but it's likely a draw!
(The main line we looked at during
and after the game was 19.Qg8+ Kh6 20.Bf4+
21.Qh7+ Kg4 22.Qxg6+ Kh4 23.Bg3#) 21.Bd3 f5 22.Bxf5
Nf8 23.Bxg5+ Kxg5 (23...Kh5? 24.g4+ Kxg5 25.Qxg7+
mates) 24.Qxg7+ Kxf5 and Fritz can find only a
draw here with 25.Qf6+ Kg4 26.Qg7+ (26.Qf4+ Kh5
27.Qf7+ Kg5=) 26...Kf5 27.Qf6+= -- Steve thought
there might be a line where the King could be forced
to the h-file and then a check would win the Black
Queen at h1, but it may have been an illusion.)
19...g5 20.Qg8+ (20.Bd3+? Kh8 21.Qe8+ Nf8! (21...Bf8?!
22.Bg3!? Qh6 23.e6 Nb6 24.e7 Bg4 25.Qxa8 Nxa8 26.e8Q
Nb6 27.Bd6 Kg8 28.Bxf8 Qxf8 29.Qg6+ Qg7 30.Qe8+=)
22.exf6 Qd1+! 23.Kxd1 Bg4+ 24.f3 Rxe8 25.Bxg5 Be6
20...Kh6! (20...Kg6!? may also draw but seems much
less clear after 21.Bf7+ Kf5 (21...Kh6? 22.exf6
mates) 22.Qxg7 (22.Be6+!?) 22...gxf4 23.Bg6+ Kxe5÷)
21.Bd3 f5 22.Bxf5 Nf8 23.Bxg5+ Kxg5 24.Qxg7+ Kxf5=
and we have transposed to the drawn main line considered
By the way, not 13...fxe5? 14.Nxd5!!
cxd5 15.Qxd5+ Rf7 16.Bc4 Qf6 17.0-0-0‚ and
Fritz thinks White is winning.
Not the best place for the Bishop. Black should probably
still take the b-pawn: 14...Qxb2! 15.Rb1 Qa3 16.e4!
(16.Nxd5? cxd5 17.Bxe5 fxe5 18.Qxd5+ Rf7 19.Bc4 Qe7)
16...f5! which is unclear. Also possible is to
seek exchanges by 14...Nc4!? 15.Bxc4 dxc4 16.0–0–0
Bg4 17.f3 Rad8 18.Bd6 Be6 19.e4 Rf7 and White has
a slight edge.
Also strong is the immediate 15.Na4! Qc7 16.Nc5 Qf7
(16...Bf5 17.e4!) 17.Qd4 Rfe8 18.Qh4 Bf5 19.0–0–0
with a strong initiative.
Steve also thought this was a bad idea. I wanted to
open up the long diagonal, with hopes of creating
counter-chances. He thought I should sit tight and
centralize. Perhaps 15...Nc4!? 16.Bxc4 dxc4 17.Qd6!?
Rfe8 18.Qf4 Rad8 19.Rxd8 Qxd8 20.Qh4 Kf7 21.Rd1 or,
as Steve suggested, 15...Rad8 16.Na4 Qc7 17.Nc5 Bc8
which is at least much better than the game line.
16.Na4! Qc7 17.Nc5
Another idea is 17.Qd4! b6 18.Qh4 Bf6 19.Bxe5!! Bxe5
20.f4 Bf6 21.Qh3 Rae8 22.g4 with attack.
Fritz prefers 17...Qb6! 18.Nxe6!? (better 18.Bxe5!
Bxe5 19.Nd3 Bg7 20.c3 Qa5 21.a3 Rae8 22.Nf4‚)
18...Nc4 19.c3 Nxd2 20.Bc7 unclear.
Sadly, the best way to hold the pawn. Fritz thinks
Black must give it up and seek counterplay with g5
and f4: 18...Rae8 19.Qxb7 Qxb7 20.Nxb7 g5 21.Bxe5
19...Bf6? 20.Bxe5!! Bxe5 (20...Bxh4? 21.Rxh4‚)
21.g4 with a strong attack.
Position after 19....Qf6.
I had expected something like 20.Qh7+ Kf7 21.Bxe5 Qxe5
22.Nd3 Qf6 23.Qh2!? but Steve didn't think he was
making sufficient progress here.
20...Bxf6 21.Bxe5! Bxe5 22.c4! dxc4?
This leads to a speedy defeat, but I had underestimated
White's attack and thought that if I did not exchange
I would soon lose the d-pawn. Not 22...Bd6?! 23.Nb3
Be6 24.Bf3 Rac8 25.Kb1±. Best, as several
people pointed out afterward, is probably 22...b6!
23.Nd3! (23.Nb3 f4!„) 23...Bd6 24.Bf3 += though
White still has pressure on the d-pawn.
23.Bxc4+ Kg7 24.Nd7! Re8
24...Bxd7? 25.Rxd7+ Kf6 26.f4! Bb8 27.Rhh7 leads to
White to play and win after 24....Re8.
The killer move I overlooked.
25...Bb8! is best, though Steve rightly assumed I would
reject it just on the looks of it. But it does pose
White some real problems: 26.Rh7+! (26.Rh3!? Rd8!
(26...Re4!?) 27.Rdh1 (27.Rh7+!? Kxh7 28.Nf6+ Kg7
29.Rxd8 Kxf6 30.Rxc8±) 27...Rxd7 28.Rh8
Bxf4 29.exf4 Kf6 30.Rf8+ Kg7 31.Rhh8± Rc7
is a little less convincing, though it looks terrible)
26...Kxh7 27.Nf6+ Kg7 28.Nxe8+ Kf8 29.Rd8
Bxf4!! (29...Ke7? 30.Rxc8 Kd7 31.Nc7 Kxc8 32.Nxa8
Bd6 33.Bf7+-) 30.Nc7+ Ke7 31.Re8+ Kd7 32.Nxa8 Kxe8
33.exf4 b5 34.Bg8 Kd8 35.Bh7 Bb7 36.Bxg6 c5 37.g3
Bxa8 38.Bxf5± Note that 25...Bf6? 26.Rh7+
Kxh7 27.Nxf6+ Kg7 28.Nxe8++- loses. But maybe 25...b5!?
followed by Bb8 is an idea?
26.Rh7+ Kxh7 27.Nf6+
and I resigned, since White either wins the Bishop
at c7 or forces mate along the h-file.
Updated 04-01-2005 |